![]() Failing to do so could result in an automatic desk rejection. However, they must substantially modify (improve) the paper and indicate its rejection history and reference the prior paper ID in the cover letter. The IEEE Transactions on ITS allows the authors of rejected papers to resubmit a rejected paper. Authors should be cognizant of that and the extra time it takes to re-evaluate an article through the process, delaying the potential of publishing their work elsewhere. Since due diligence is performed during the review process, appeals rarely result in a decision change. A tally of favorable reviews against a minority of “reject” recommendations is not an adequate reason for appeals, either. The associate editors consider various reviewers’ comments, weigh the substance, ignore irrelevant comments, and reflect on their own evaluation to arrive at a final recommendation. However, this is not a valid reason to submit an appeal. Authors’ differences of opinions often occur with reviews received. Appeals will only be considered in cases of significant review discrepancies or reviewer mishandling. However, over-repetition of such phrases can result in a page being rejected by search engines.Īppeals to the manuscript decisions should be submitted to the Editor in Chief, copying the Editorial Administrator and must include the paper ID number.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |